Graduation at UC San Diego

UC San Diego

B.S. Biochemistry and Cell Biology, 2018

Huffaker Lab, UCSD

USDA-ARS area-wide pest management program

The invasive sugarcane aphid in grain sorghum

Aphids land and attach.

Most plants suffer. A few resist.

What makes the survivors different?

The molecular interactions between aphid and host.

Searching for genetic loci associated with resistance.

We screened hundreds of genetically diverse sorghum varieties for their resistance to sugarcane aphids and performed a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to identify genetic variants associated with resistance.

We identified a strong association near the transcription factor SbWRKY86.

We then used gene-expression and functional experiments in other plant systems to show that increased expression of this gene reduced aphid populations.

In the lab at Singular Genomics

Singular Genomics

2016Founded
2017Series A
2019Series B
2021IPONASDAQ: OMIC, ~$258M raised
2023Grewto ~300 people
2025Layoffs, then acquired by Deerfielddown to ~150
2026R&D layoffsdown to ~100 people
2019RA Ijoined as employee 45
2020RA II
2022Senior RA
2024Associate Scientist
2026Scientist I

Seven years. One company's full lifecycle.

Three stories.

  1. 1Building the G4 flow cell
  2. 2The bleach mystery
  3. 3Multiplexed protein detection

G4 and G4X: two instruments, concept to commercial.

Story one

Building the G4 flow cell.

Nanoimprinted glass with empty wells
Wells filled with polymer
Surface primers attached in the wells
One template strand seeded per well
04b-bridging.png pending
Amplified clusters in every well
AI-generated illustration
G4X instrument
A flow cell with tissue sections, held in a gloved hand

Start with nanoimprinted glass.

Standard glass works, but random template seeding is Poisson-limited: as occupancy rises, so does the chance of multiple templates landing on one feature.

Nanoimprinted, patterned flow cells with controlled seeding chemistry target one template per feature, minimizing empty and polyclonal features.

Which glass, which vendor, which material, and what stays compatible with the workflow?

Fill the wells with polymer.

  • Polymer chemistry & architectureRAFT · PEG · linear vs. branched / tree-like
  • Degree of polymerizationTuning polymer chain length
  • Surface attachmentGrafting-to vs. grafting-from
  • Surface & substrate compatibilityM-type · Ormocomp · BD
  • Optimize for the biologyPrimer density · clustering · cbPCR performance
Grafting-fromGrafting-to

Functionalize the surface with primers.

  • Attachment chemistryDBCO-mediated coupling / click chemistry
  • Primer densityDegree of labeling · surface density
  • Primer architectureSpacer length · PolyT · ss vs. ds presentation
  • Coupling conditionsConcentration · time · temperature

Seed the wells with DNA.

  • Template concentration & seeding densityControl occupancy of individual nanowells
  • Seeding chemistrySalt · buffer · temperature
  • Library propertiesLibrary type · concentration · denaturation
  • Loading conditionsTime · wetting · fluidics
  • Maximize usable wellsHigh occupancy · minimize mixed clusters

Clonally amplify each template.

  • Amplification chemistryPolymerase · Betaine · Mg²⁺ · buffers
  • Thermal conditionsTemperature · extension time · cycle number
  • Reaction environmentpH · salts · additives
  • Amplification efficiencyCluster intensity · density · uniformity
  • Optimize for sequencingHigh-quality, spatially confined clonal clusters
  • Optimize for amplificationAccessibility · hybridization · cbPCR performance

From above, the clusters are the dots from the start.

Then prove an instrument can do it.

G4X: same toolkit, new problem.

Tissue on glass that stays put.

Co-inventor, U.S. Patent: Solid Supports Useful for Tissue Adherence

One workflow, every generation.

From a benchtop assay to a fully integrated sequencing workflow.

Fluidics

Tubing · valves · port mapping

Flow rates · washes

Thermal control

Temperature · incubation

Cycling · reagent stability

Automation

Template seeding · cbPCR

Cluster processing

Troubleshooting

Chemistry × fluidics

Hardware × software

ManualIntegratedAutomatedProduction
Breadboardmanual
Alphaearly integration
Betaonboard development
G4integrated
Turbooptimized
Productionproductionized

Back from the Fourth of July break.

We powered the instruments back on and ran system diagnostics.

Nearly 100% failing.

Where does the failure live?

Bisect the workflow.

Every step can run by hand or on the instrument.

Move one block at a time and watch the result.

Leading theory: the bleach.

A bleach formulation change took effect about two weeks before the break.

Kit timing meant the new formulation first ran right after the shutdown.

Bleach runs through first.

Working hypothesis: it damages the manifold.

Then the DNA follows.

Working hypothesis: it sticks in the manifold, or breaks down on the way.

Almost nothing reaches the flow cell.

The fix.

  • Rinse the system thoroughly
  • Swap the affected parts
  • Bleach 100x lower
July4
July3

Something had broken across nearly the entire fleet.

~500Mexpected reads / flow cell

versus

<1Mobserved

The same failure was appearing across independent instruments.

Run the workflow manually

WORKS

Run the workflow onboard

FAILS

The biology worked. Something about integration didn't.

By hand On the instrument
12345678
Suspects
Running…Works
Running…Works
The culpritRunning…Fails

Steps 1 to 4 on the instrument. It works.

Steps 5 and 6 on the instrument. Still works.

Step 7 alone on the instrument. It fails.

1/100x1x
Bleach concentration

Story two

Assay Troubleshooting.

Biology and engineering share failure modes.

The exact mechanism was never fully solved. It wasn't critical to the business goal at the time, so we didn't pursue it further.

Story three

Multiplexed Protein Detection.

Reading protein in situ.

  1. Antibody-oligo conjugate binds its epitope
  2. Fixed in place
  3. A near-complete DNA circle hybridizes
  4. Ligation closes the circle
  5. Rolling circle amplification
  6. One channel lights up

Color tells us target. Timing adds capacity.

Current1 cycle × 4 colors= 4 targets per primer
Proposed8 cycles × 3 colors= 24 targets per primer

× 6 primers = 144 theoretical slots, toward the ~120-target goal

More proteins. The same hardware.

Higher-plex panels for applications such as ADC evaluation.

A delayed signal can look like another protein.

When timing encodes identity, carryover matters.

Early tests showed substantial carryover: signal appearing in a later slot could be mistaken for another target.

A step back to fundamentals.

After extensive troubleshooting, we revisited a fundamental design choice: the DNA backbone.

Changing the backbone revealed a key contributor to the unwanted signal.

Keep the dim cells visible.

Later read positions made some weaker signals harder to detect.

More targets. Reliable biological detail.

Refining the readout improved signal, with further work needed to reach the full multiplexing goal.

24targets
~120target goal
Same instrument

Cycle 1

GTCA

Cycle12345678
Reads as another target

GTCOff (dark): not a target

Poly-A backbone

↓

Poly-G backbone

Intended signal Delayed echo

Early read
Later read

Schematic

More target capacity

24 toward a ~120-target goal

Clearer target separation

Smaller delayed echo

Weak signals more visible

Further work still needed

Outside the lab.

Photography

Eight years running a photo business.

Portrait with sparkling water spray
Steel wool light painting
Family portrait
Maternity portrait
Surfer on a wave
Climber on a rock face
Pagoda roofline
Canyon landscape

Surf

Snowboard

Scuba

Cook

Sarthak Duggal

Sarthak Duggal

Why Exthymic.

  • A small team doing R&D
  • Cell therapy
  • Surface and consumables work

How I built this.

  • Claude Code
  • AI-generated flow cell visuals
  • GitHub
  • Deployed to my own subdomain
  • 11 commits

Thank you.